If you're going to make a ridiculous argument at least have the balls to use proper examples. If I'm going to criticize Ford's designs for example, I'm not going to whip out pics of a Transit or a Kuga. Here are some pretty renaults for your consideration:
The Clio and the 11 aren't really sports cars, though I did use the fancy ultra-hot versions because they tend to look the best. The more standard models look just as good, though!
If I had to guess, I'd say it's because sports cars tend to be more carefully styled than standard economy/city cars. Most people who buy a new daily driver won't really care much for how it looks, but rather how practical and fuel efficient it is. Sports cars are a luxury, rather than a necessity, so the target audience will be much more interested in style and peformance, giving the designers and engineers no choice but to make the car good looking and fun to use
Can you clarify in what ways? Because for strictly small city driving, I'd want that tight turning radius. Also he's right about the performance, I'd rather drive a slow car fast than a fast car slow. You can rev the tits out of underpowered cars and feel the tires losing grip without even breaking the speed limit.
yeah its a simple economy car...theres no cool that you can show of unless you rice it yah no plus it aint sold in america
When you buy a simple economy car, you don't buy it for the purpose of showing off. And how does a car not being sold in America decide if the car is good or not? You get the Smart Fortwo in the US which is heavily related to the Twingo, just with 2 fewer doors.
A more reasonable answer if someone dislikes a Twingo is because it's nothing special out of Renault or probably doesn't have the "spirit" of the Clio.
The Twingo has the spirit of the Clio, except if you get in an accident in a Twingo it'll hold you in its arms and protect you..
In performance, likely, but the Clio STILL is alive and a favorable alternative. (Remember that the Clio is a Renault classic)
