1. Trouble with the game?
    Try the troubleshooter!

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Issues with the game?
    Check the Known Issues list before reporting!

    Dismiss Notice

Update Speculation thread

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by crazikyle, Jan 26, 2016.

  1. catchow1977

    catchow1977
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2022
    Messages:
    2,050
    that would be alot better than the current situation maybe it started out as a licensed version and grew to be a seperate thing through out the years
     
  2. pigeonperson

    pigeonperson
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2023
    Messages:
    1,153
    I've driven and been in a lifted four door Wrangler and whenever a truck went by in the other lane it would get some serious wobbles and almost go straight off the road. They truly do drive like shit.
     
  3. urbanestdog45

    urbanestdog45
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2018
    Messages:
    265
    the biggest problem I have with the hopper is that the stock steering bends way too easily when crawling so a reinforced version would be nice
     
  4. Danny the Sniper

    Danny the Sniper
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2023
    Messages:
    1,371
    I'd love to see 5-door and pickup body styles for the Hopper, as well as diesel engines, military configs, and a US rebadge. :)
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. McBeamer94

    McBeamer94
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2019
    Messages:
    2,878
    Exactly. I never found the point in this car being an Ibishu other than depicting the Asian copycats. I mean, the 2.5 I4 and the 4.0 I6 engines of this car share the same displacements with some Bruckell engines (the 2.5 I4 is the same size as the 2.5 I4 of the Bruckell LeGran and Soliad Lansdale and the 4.0 I6 has the same displacement as the 244CUI, or 4.0-liter, Econo-Six I6 of the Bruckell Moonhawk). So yeah, the model in general could definitely very well be a Bruckell Hopper! Sounds nice as a name too!
    And these Bruckell engines themselves could also be shared with the Hopper and have the exact same gradual upgrades and improvements in engine peripherals (intakes and rev limiters) as the other Bruckell models of the era, to keep the buyers interested. The 2.5 I4, for example, could start in the 1989 MY in the same state as in the Bruckell LeGran S (that's 102hp/190Nm, verified by the Torque Curve UI App, as are all the other numbers you'll read) and it could be upgraded for the 1996 MY to the same state as the then newly-introduced Lansdale (that's 140hp/221Nm). Just for reference, the current 2.5 I4 of the current Hopper produces 123hp/218Nm, without any upgrade options.
    As for the 244CUI I6, it needs more modern peripherals to get inline with its era, au contrair to its malaise days in the Moonhawk, and it could start in the 1989 MY with the current Hopper's 165hp/296Nm (already coming a long way since the Moonhawk's 105hp/228Nm), and end its final 2001 MY with, say, 185hp/320Nm! There's big potential in the 244CUI I6 being reused and repurposed after the discontinuation of the Moonhawk for Bruckell's 80s, 90s and 00s SUVs! :)

    So, stats!

    1989 - 1995 Bruckell Hopper with Bruckell engines:
    2.5 I4 -> 102hp/190Nm
    4.0 I6 -> 165hp/296Nm

    1996 - 2001 Bruckell Hopper facelift with Bruckell engines:
    2.5 I4 -> 140hp/221Nm
    4.0 I6 -> 185hp/320Nm

    Current Hopper's Ibishu engines' stats, just for reference:
    2.5 I4 -> 123hp/218Nm
    4.0 I6 -> 165hp/296Nm
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
    • Like Like x 2
  6. Danny the Sniper

    Danny the Sniper
    Expand Collapse
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2023
    Messages:
    1,371
    Now that you mention it, the YJ Wrangler had fuel injection, so it would make sense to include it in those engines.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. McBeamer94

    McBeamer94
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2019
    Messages:
    2,878
    Yep, especially the 244 I6 could benefit from it immensely!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. CrashHavenBNG

    CrashHavenBNG
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2025
    Messages:
    3,356
    No offence, but i love that the Americans here cant accept that the hopper is Japanese. In the BeamNG Universe it’s likely not an American design. Guys, if we need another american car it has to be peak 70s and 80s sedans and wagons.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  9. McBeamer94

    McBeamer94
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2019
    Messages:
    2,878
    I'm European and I could accept it if it weren't for two reasons:

    1) the engine displacements are just too similar - literally no-brainer, as I said, and
    2) the lovely Classic variant, with its military styling and reference, would never be made by a company from a country which lost a war (and in a truly awful way at that, too). Seems extremely off, tbh...
     
    #73589 McBeamer94, Aug 12, 2025
    Last edited: Aug 12, 2025
    • Agree Agree x 5
  10. CrashHavenBNG

    CrashHavenBNG
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2025
    Messages:
    3,356
    Now that makes sense. I just want a simplified traffic hopper.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. ClarOnNG

    ClarOnNG
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2025
    Messages:
    404
    I'm from the U.S., and to be honest, I don't really care about the fact that the Hopper is Japanese
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  12. pigeonperson

    pigeonperson
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2023
    Messages:
    1,153
    I'm Australian and I think it's a bit stupid, for the same reasons as McBeamer
     
    • Like Like x 3
  13. gtaman788

    gtaman788
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2012
    Messages:
    1,186
    As a Aussie who wants a moonhawk remake, with sedans to mimic the next best thing to a Aussie HOLDEN Ford falcon and aussie valiant,

    Seeing the hopper become a Japeses pick up truck like what every out back ute is the landy ( landcruiser )

    Would be a dream come true, EVEN if its only a 2 door, a ute version would be ideal I guess ute the world :p
     

    Attached Files:

    • 2023-08-2024-toyota-landcruiser-70-series-1.jpg
    • 24127927-1-3.jpg
    • Agree Agree x 10
  14. pigeonperson

    pigeonperson
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2023
    Messages:
    1,153
    Completely agreed, we need a 76/79 Landcruiser or maybe a ln65 Hilux/4runner
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  15. urbanestdog45

    urbanestdog45
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2018
    Messages:
    265
    Also proper ute trays for the D series would be nice
    something like this
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
  16. Ax50

    Ax50
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2019
    Messages:
    518
    WWII is canon in the BeamNGverse?
     
  17. CrashHavenBNG

    CrashHavenBNG
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2025
    Messages:
    3,356
    Jungle rock Island literally has WWII Bunkers and a abandoned wwii plane.
     
    • Agree Agree x 9
  18. united.

    united.
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2020
    Messages:
    533
    we all know what ETK was doing during that time...
     
    • Agree Agree x 15
  19. CrashHavenBNG

    CrashHavenBNG
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2025
    Messages:
    3,356
    Lore friendly beetle?… tHoSe WhO kNoW
     
  20. McBeamer94

    McBeamer94
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2019
    Messages:
    2,878
    No it is not and I agree with your notice. But this is clearly an exception since we're talking about history and not the BeamNG lore. And since the Classic variant's source of inspiration is the Willy's Jeep and this is implied in its description ("A tribute to a classic military vehicle", and everyone knows what that vehicle is called and where it comes from), then yes, it most definitely is canon for the Hopper and a wrong canon at that.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice