cool, show me. his profile aint saying dev anywhere. as far as im aware. he aint a beamng dev. looks like its hard to read a profile.
In the beamng game credits Helping behind the scenes, while not a developer, still does stuff which I assume has to deal with quality control, beta testing, idea development and possibly help as well. Definitely still involved in it
bruh, drowsy sam was a dev like 5 years ago, he then left for some reason that im not aware of. just because he DID work for beamng at some point, and that his names are in the credit, that he is STILL A BEAMNG DEV.... if he was still a dev, his profile would be glowing with a nice dev badge. as simple as that.
might even be more than that Official BeamNG Content: Bollard Cannon Inflated mat Kickplate Angle Tester Bridge Barrier Large Cannon Crusher Hamster Wheel Roller Crusher Spinner Tilt Board Metal Box Metal Ramp Wall Dyno Pigeon revised front suspension Roof rack loads, ladder, pipe D-Series 3 Link from his profile, he did the pigeon suspension and d series stuff aswell --- Post updated --- he did the pigeon suspension for the redux on the pigeon, that was not five years ago
man you've been here since 2013 i feel like you should know a bit more than that (read this in a lighthearted tone)
eh cant be bothered. if he was still a dev he profile would have that nice dev badge. idk when he left. it would not be the first discussion i see about him not being a dev. but suddenly in 2022 he would still be a dev without a badge. yeah suuuuuuuure. whatever floats your boat.
-demands to see evidence he is wrong- -posts *eh cant be bothered* when shown evidence he asked for- alright buddy cant help the ignorant --- Post updated --- Also here
m8 ignorant while his profile clearly shows he aint a dev. yeah sure. im ignorant bc i choose to believe in actual proof, aka his profile badge which all devs are based on to see if they are devs or not. what a great delusional forum. oh great he was on the team for 2-3 years. so freaking what? he is STILL A DEV RIGHT NOW? no. holy shit people cant read or understand jack shit in this cesspool of a forum
i dont recall saying he was a dev? if you could show the post where i said right now he was a dev i would love to see it all i recall doing was showing evidence he was a dev and did official content, some of it recently in the pigeon and d series
LOL. so we are both arguing for nothing. i know he was a dev. what im saying is that he is no longer a dev. all im arguing about is that he aint a dev no more.
nah, all i did was reply to this kid to say he is no longer a dev. after that nobody understood what i said and started arguing he was still a dev. seems like reading isnt what this forum does best.
no was was arguing he was a dev for the past like 10 minutes lets just drop it here and move on ok? it has nothing to do with the update
LMAO. You just noticed that? Everyone asking for release dates for X thing even though something was already said about that, what about ppl ignoring big red text at the bottom of their screen and then proceed to bump months/years old posts? And let's not forget all of those who don't properly read or understand replies. Your argument here would've ended a long while ago if ppl just read. Roflmao Nobody here reads, should be clearly obvious lol everyone just blows whatever you say out of proportions & twist your words to something you don't mean.
Exactly. As someone else on here once said, most people don't even actually read the forum rules when signing up, but just carelessly scrooll through and click agree like on any other terms and conditions prompt (which is essentially what the rules are)
Well, in an attempt to get this thread back on topic... I have a theory. I could be completely wrong, but hear me out. It’s about the engines. See, we’ve been getting “remastered car + 1 new car” style updates for 3 updates, iirc first one being 0.22. One thing I found interesting was that the remastered cars and the new ones share very similar engines: 0.22 — Wendover had different i4s and V6s, same with the Legran 0.23 — Pigeon and Wigeon both had a selection of i3s (I think?) and i4s 0.24 — this one doesn’t rly count since we didn’t get a new car, but 2 remastered cars 0.24.1 — Bastion and Bolide both had V8s, albeit with very different displacement sizes 0.25 — right, so here’s my theory: as far as I know, most supercars have a “poor man’s base model”. If this trend continues, I wouldn’t be surprised if the new Civetta will have a V6 engine for the cheapest model, and hence the Group B-ish Covet might also have a V6? Maybe? Again, this ‘trend’ might just be purely coincidental, but its smth I found interesting nevertheless.
I find it rather unlikely that the new Civetta supercar would have a V6, they would probably save that for a seperate model. It would be cool to get an aftermarket Bolide V8 or even Gavril OHC swap.
Yeah, I have to agree to that, now that you mentioned it. On that note, I think the modern Civetta might have a V10 or V12, and of that's the case, then it might explain why development is taking so long. I mean, it would be the first vanilla car to have either of these engine types. A lot of work is probably needed for a completely new engine. We’ll see I guess.