No, thats too obvious. Yes, its really discusting and ugly, but its probably posted more than 40 times already here.
So do you think it's ugly because it's ugly, or because it's popular? One of those I can respect, and the other I just can't. You decide which. Also do please tell me what makes it ugly to you. It's not aggressive or angular. In fact, none of the 90's Japanese sports cars were. They were all reserved in style and big on performance... like cars should be.
Well, plastic bubbles. But the engine is good. As a kid the styling never really sold me. --- Post updated --- Hmmm?
Yeah but a lot of 90s car were bubbly plastic. I don't see what makes this special than the others. Also that 22b's foglamps are so easy to fix because they just have their own covers for it. This reminds me a lot from the Toyota Alphard... and not for good reasons.
The Aztek is ugly to the point of being a cult classic. The Prius is ugly and awful. I'd have the Aztek.
Well, I'm saying the D-Max looks worse than the Ranger, so I'm not saying the Ranger is the worse of the 2. I do think the Ranger's design isn't 100% great, but it's definitely better than the D-Max (and hell, even the current F-Series).