1. Trouble with the game?
    Try the troubleshooter!

    Dismiss Notice

  2. Issues with the game?
    Check the Known Issues list before reporting!

    Dismiss Notice
Support Troubleshooter Known Issues

CPU Performance in Drive

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Junky228, Apr 27, 2014.

Page 5 of 9
  1. garyjpaterson

    garyjpaterson
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    273
    Yeah ive been in windowed the whole time too, since the resolution is so low it looks horrific full screen.
     
    #81 garyjpaterson, Apr 29, 2014
  2. Bubbleawsome

    Bubbleawsome
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,886
    Covet is a bit less demanding.
     
    #82 Bubbleawsome, Apr 29, 2014
  3. Junky228

    Junky228
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2014
    Messages:
    63
    i have an octocore (8 cores), -snipped long message...more on that in a sec-
    i just realised i think you got your people mixed up, when i was talking about the 'stock 3.2 with a turbo to 3.8...' i was referring to deject3d's cpu, not mine.....if you replace -Junky- with -deject3d- then everything would make sense, sorry about the confusion
     
    #83 Junky228, Apr 29, 2014
  4. garyjpaterson

    garyjpaterson
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    273
    Ok, just done the Moonhawk, definitely much lower FPS. After this i'm going to pitch all 3 cars against each other to compare FPS on a graph.

    Once again,
    3770K @4.5GHz, AMD Radeon HD6870.
    Stock Moonhawk, all lowest settings/res, pure Grid map.

    Phsysics On/Off, cars listed from 1 to 10.

    [TABLE="width: 128"]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 64, align: right"]230[/TD]
    [TD="width: 64, align: right"]660[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]120[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]390[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]77[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]280[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]52[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]210[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]32[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]173[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]21[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]137[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]16[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]120[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]15[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]103[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]12[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]92[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]12[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]82[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]

    beamngfpsmoonhawk.jpg
     
    #84 garyjpaterson, Apr 29, 2014
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2014
  5. Junky228

    Junky228
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2014
    Messages:
    63
    wait is this the covet or the moonhawk? the top makes me think moonhawk, the data area says covet....i assume moonhawk and you just edited the values from the other post?
     
    #85 Junky228, Apr 29, 2014
  6. garyjpaterson

    garyjpaterson
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    273
    Yes sorry, Moonhawk! Did a bit of copy and pasting, seems i let that slip through! Thanks for pointing that out.
     
    #86 garyjpaterson, Apr 29, 2014
  7. Junky228

    Junky228
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2014
    Messages:
    63
    got it, thanks data is in :) , after posting that i also noticed the graph said moonhawk so i figured it out

    your fps is so much better :( (though your processor is also 3x the price)

    thanks for all the data,
     
    #87 Junky228, Apr 29, 2014
  8. garyjpaterson

    garyjpaterson
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    273
    Just for fun, did a comparison of the 3 cars, Physics on.

    3770k @4.5GHz, AMD Radeon 6870.

    Moonhawk Covet D-Series

    [TABLE="width: 192"]
    [TR]
    [TD="width: 64, align: right"]230[/TD]
    [TD="width: 64, align: right"]303[/TD]
    [TD="width: 64, align: right"]295[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]120[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]153[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]160[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]77[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]102[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]103[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]52[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]74[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]73[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]32[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]53[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]56[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]21[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]44[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]44[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]16[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]25[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]24[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]15[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]22[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]21[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]12[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]19[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]18[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD="align: right"]12[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]17[/TD]
    [TD="align: right"]17[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]

    Looks like the D-Series and Covet are really close.

    beamngfpscomparison.jpg
     
    #88 garyjpaterson, Apr 29, 2014
  9. Kitty

    Kitty
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2012
    Messages:
    87
    i7 4700hq @3.4ghz, Gtx675m, and 12gb of 1600mhz ram
    Gavril D series
    Physics on
    1, 172 fps
    2, 89 fps
    3, 60 fps
    4, 32 fps
    5, 20 fps
    8, 11 fps
    Physics off
    1, 350 fps
    2, 260 fps
    3, 210 fps
    4, 170 fps
    5, 153 fps
    8, 100 fps
     
    #89 Kitty, Apr 30, 2014
  10. logoster

    logoster
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    2,083
    #90 logoster, Apr 30, 2014
  11. deject3d

    deject3d
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2013
    Messages:
    250
    this is true for all directx games, and the effect is pretty much negligible.
     
    #91 deject3d, Apr 30, 2014
  12. KarlRyker

    KarlRyker
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2013
    Messages:
    205
    Heres my results for the D-series on my Q6600 2.4 GHz

    1 car = on 56 off 104
    2 cars = on 21 off 84
    3 cars = on 17 off 71
    4 cars = on 14 off 63
    5 cars = crash

    Covet

    1 car = 64 100
    2 cars = 22 71
    3 cars = 18 67
    4 cars = 13 53
    5 cars = 10 47
    6 cars = 9 44
    7 cars = 8 41
    8 cars = 7 38
    9 cars = 6 34
    10 cars = 5 32

    Moonhawk (Ready for depressing?)

    1 car = 17 93
    2 cars = 15 68
    3 cars = crash
     
    #92 KarlRyker, May 3, 2014
    Last edited: May 3, 2014
  13. garyjpaterson

    garyjpaterson
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    273
    I dont remember my Q6600 performing that bad? Then again i cant remember the last time i tried multiple cars on it. Also its OC'd to 3.0GHz.

    When i go to my parents house over summer, its the PC i use, so i'll test it out in a month or so.
     
    #93 garyjpaterson, May 3, 2014
  14. tuningfreak1

    tuningfreak1
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    230
    on first post it says 3,7 ghz but my cpu is at 3,3 or on turbo i get max 3.7 ghz ;)
     
    #94 tuningfreak1, May 3, 2014
  15. KarlRyker

    KarlRyker
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2013
    Messages:
    205
    Mine is at 2.4 GHz and is 6 years old sooooo...
     
    #95 KarlRyker, May 3, 2014
  16. Junky228

    Junky228
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2014
    Messages:
    63
    yeah, i looked it up and saw it turbo-ed to 3.7, so i used that number...im not familiar with turbo boost but recently i read it only does turbo boost if 1-2 cores are being used. if so then i guess it would be staying at stock clocks while playing the game? Should i change it back to 3.3 or leave it at 3.7??
    -also, congratz, you are the only processor that takes up 2 lines in the table :cool: because i refuse to make it any wider
     
    #96 Junky228, May 4, 2014
    Last edited: May 4, 2014
  17. KarlRyker

    KarlRyker
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2013
    Messages:
    205
    I've noticed that on the first post for the D-series and the Moonhawk you put "Intel Core 2 Q6600" but on the Covet you put "Intel Core 2 Quad"
     
    #97 KarlRyker, May 5, 2014
  18. Junky228

    Junky228
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2014
    Messages:
    63
    oops, thanks, i initially put in core 2 quad, then i went back and changed it to q6600, guess i forgot to change that entry :p
     
    #98 Junky228, May 6, 2014
  19. FZulley

    FZulley
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2013
    Messages:
    75
    I might be able to add Data for a i7 4770k tomorrow after work ;)
     
    #99 FZulley, May 9, 2014
  20. tuningfreak1

    tuningfreak1
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    230
    would be cool if on the front page the cpus performance would be lined up from the worst fps to the best
     
    #100 tuningfreak1, May 9, 2014
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 5 of 9
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...
    Dismiss Notice