BANANA Benchmark Results Comparison

I have an i9 12900H in a MSI GL76 Laptop scored 515

 

i5-10600K 50x core 47x ring 1.3v 3000mhz ddr4

 

I noticed no one has run Devil's Canyon on the newer test yet, so here's an i7 4790k running at a modest 4.6 GHz steady. 218.211 Mbeams/s and 18 cars in realtime

 

Nearly 6 years later and I thought it'd be interesting to compare the numbers for the same CPU. More than double, that's progress!

 

Ryzen 7 5800X3D @ stock boost of 4450MHz

 

A little bit of overclocking and a whole lot of luck got me this run. 664.792 on a 3950X.

 

How do i run the bench with 50 car? Nothing found how 2 3 page earlier

 

737K


Here mine 12700k
P-core 5100mhz E-core 4100mhz Uncore 4100mhz
Ram Oloy DDR4
4000mhz cl14-14-14-34 2T 275 TRFC 19000 TREFI GEAR 1 2x16gb

 

2 pages earlier
https://www.beamng.com/threads/banana-benchmark-results-comparison.8595/page-67#post-1401970

 

Two years later, I got a 7950x. The result is peculiar - sadly I don't have the 5900x anymore to test it on the latest bananabench. Shouldn't there be an uplift at least from the extra cores? (5900x result was 518.363 Mbeams/s)

Code:

][ v6 | 0.6.5.4 (64 Bit) built Mon Sep 12 12:31:45 2022 | now: Tuesday Tue Oct  4 20:35:19 2022
][ Windows 10.0 (build 22000), 64-bit | RAM: 31.12 GB | Toolset: 19.29.30146 / 192930146
][ AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor | 32 cores | 4491 MHz
   +----------+----------+
   | MBeams/s | % Realt  |
---+----------+----------+
 1 |  136.008 |  1476.10 |
 2 |  185.471 |  1006.46 |
 3 |  252.406 |   913.13 |
 4 |  300.905 |   816.43 |
 5 |  355.868 |   772.45 |
 6 |  428.492 |   775.07 |
 7 |  493.610 |   765.31 |
 8 |  424.418 |   575.78 |
 9 |  371.024 |   447.42 |
10 |  360.982 |   391.78 |
11 |  372.171 |   367.20 |
12 |  390.399 |   353.08 |
13 |  403.594 |   336.94 |
14 |  429.357 |   332.85 |
15 |  442.102 |   319.88 |
16 |  456.480 |   309.64 |
17 |  487.131 |   310.99 |
18 |  487.333 |   293.84 |
19 |  488.659 |   279.13 |
20 |  464.055 |   251.82 |
21 |  477.148 |   246.60 |
22 |  488.427 |   240.95 |
23 |  498.199 |   235.09 |
24 |  487.453 |   220.43 |
25 |  483.614 |   209.95 |
26 |  500.075 |   208.74 |
27 |  506.736 |   203.69 |
28 |  521.379 |   202.09 |
29 |  521.834 |   195.29 |
30 |  522.620 |   189.07 |
31 |  523.707 |   183.35 |
32 |  530.167 |   179.81 |
33 |  493.785 |   162.40 |
34 |  495.279 |   158.10 |
35 |  492.554 |   152.73 |
36 |  503.335 |   151.74 |
37 |  505.393 |   148.24 |
38 |  514.000 |   146.80 |
39 |  516.368 |   143.70 |
40 |  519.793 |   141.03 |
Max Mbeams/s:   530.167 Mbeams/s

 BANANAA!!!
 .______,#
 \ -----'/
  `-----'
Press any key to continue . . .

EDIT:
I set max vehicles to 50 and the max was something like 548, devs what's up with your benchmark tool?

 

That's weird, score should be higher given i've seen 5950x's reach 650k on > 32 cars

Try running the benchmark again after a fresh reboot and without nothing running in the backround.
--- Post updated ---

I've seen a 4790K @ 5GHz reach 250 Mbeams in 0.25.2.0
--- Post updated ---

With all power limits unlocked I saw one reach 440 Mbeams/s and 420 Mbeam/s with power limits in place
--- Post updated ---

what was the OC and mem speed?

 

@MenkoD Maybe you will not reach top Mbeamns/s but you still will be rewarded with masive portion of number of cars(>100 % Realt).
Try what @alpf300 is advising. My score jumped from 488 to 516 Mbeams/s on 8 core 11700f when I disable few useless win services and killed all programs on taskbar near clock icon.

 

a 5700G can do 510 Mbeam/s

 

Good result too

 

Set max vehicles to 150. Max MBeam/s 589.986 and max real-time vehicles 63. I'm positive that I can do more after getting better RAM + tweaking w/ HYDRA or something. Closing services etc. didn't do anything (obviously). Maybe a new AGESA + windows version can patch things up

Code:

C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\BeamNG.drive>"C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\BeamNG.drive\Bin64\\console.x64.exe" file lua/console/bananabench-print.lua
][ v6 | 0.6.5.4 (64 Bit) built Mon Sep 12 12:31:45 2022 | now: Friday Fri Oct  7 10:56:36 2022
][ Windows 10.0 (build 22000), 64-bit | RAM: 31.12 GB | Toolset: 19.29.30146 / 192930146
][ AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor | 32 cores | 4500 MHz
   +----------+----------+
   | MBeams/s | % Realt  |
---+----------+----------+
 1 |  138.013 |  1497.86 |
 2 |  245.008 |  1329.54 |
 3 |  268.739 |   972.21 |
 4 |  328.895 |   892.38 |
 5 |  395.288 |   858.02 |
 6 |  468.842 |   848.06 |
 7 |  528.993 |   820.17 |
 8 |  475.500 |   645.08 |
 9 |  378.966 |   456.99 |
10 |  366.225 |   397.47 |
11 |  362.572 |   357.73 |
12 |  386.239 |   349.32 |
13 |  401.438 |   335.14 |
14 |  422.661 |   327.65 |
15 |  440.771 |   318.91 |
16 |  460.968 |   312.68 |
17 |  491.988 |   314.09 |
18 |  501.573 |   302.42 |
19 |  504.461 |   288.15 |
20 |  490.294 |   266.06 |
21 |  486.149 |   251.25 |
22 |  493.457 |   243.43 |
23 |  500.274 |   236.07 |
24 |  490.391 |   221.76 |
25 |  484.203 |   210.20 |
26 |  495.702 |   206.92 |
27 |  510.603 |   205.24 |
28 |  513.413 |   199.00 |
29 |  517.588 |   193.70 |
30 |  522.347 |   188.97 |
31 |  524.263 |   183.54 |
32 |  522.999 |   177.38 |
33 |  492.059 |   161.83 |
34 |  491.853 |   157.00 |
35 |  489.471 |   151.78 |
36 |  503.022 |   151.65 |
37 |  511.950 |   150.17 |
38 |  516.372 |   147.48 |
39 |  512.138 |   142.52 |
40 |  518.628 |   140.72 |
41 |  516.672 |   136.77 |
42 |  520.244 |   134.43 |
43 |  520.180 |   131.29 |
44 |  528.326 |   130.32 |
45 |  522.229 |   125.95 |
46 |  529.692 |   124.97 |
47 |  530.820 |   122.57 |
48 |  542.650 |   122.70 |
49 |  533.447 |   118.15 |
50 |  536.876 |   116.53 |
51 |  542.711 |   115.49 |
52 |  544.968 |   113.74 |
53 |  553.302 |   113.30 |
54 |  551.182 |   110.78 |
55 |  556.676 |   109.85 |
56 |  564.557 |   109.41 |
57 |  565.875 |   107.75 |
58 |  575.959 |   107.77 |
59 |  580.175 |   106.72 |
60 |  586.380 |   106.07 |
61 |  586.146 |   104.29 |
62 |  589.986 |   103.28 |
63 |  584.757 |   100.74 |
64 |  585.615 |    99.31 |
65 |  575.539 |    96.10 |
66 |  563.414 |    92.65 |
67 |  560.643 |    90.82 |
68 |  559.062 |    89.23 |
69 |  555.312 |    87.35 |
70 |  551.335 |    85.48 |
71 |  549.577 |    84.01 |
72 |  554.657 |    83.61 |
73 |  551.129 |    81.94 |
74 |  551.215 |    80.84 |
75 |  550.831 |    79.71 |
76 |  549.315 |    78.44 |
77 |  543.494 |    76.60 |
78 |  544.187 |    75.72 |
79 |  540.970 |    74.32 |
80 |  542.891 |    73.65 |
81 |  544.349 |    72.94 |
82 |  540.146 |    71.49 |
83 |  544.092 |    71.15 |
84 |  564.765 |    72.97 |
85 |  565.243 |    72.17 |
86 |  563.685 |    71.14 |
87 |  568.061 |    70.86 |
88 |  575.752 |    71.01 |
89 |  568.661 |    69.34 |
90 |  571.506 |    68.92 |
91 |  571.623 |    68.17 |
92 |  574.592 |    67.78 |
93 |  567.592 |    66.24 |
94 |  570.222 |    65.84 |
95 |  569.368 |    65.05 |
96 |  566.751 |    64.07 |
97 |  561.245 |    62.80 |
98 |  564.613 |    62.53 |
99 |  557.179 |    61.08 |
100 |  560.949 |    60.88 |
101 |  550.210 |    59.12 |
102 |  554.390 |    58.99 |
103 |  554.549 |    58.43 |
104 |  555.572 |    57.98 |
105 |  549.452 |    56.79 |
106 |  546.206 |    55.92 |
107 |  552.231 |    56.01 |
108 |  548.964 |    55.17 |
109 |  541.069 |    53.87 |
110 |  537.093 |    52.99 |
111 |  543.015 |    53.09 |
112 |  542.743 |    52.59 |
113 |  531.800 |    51.08 |
114 |  536.865 |    51.11 |
115 |  537.672 |    50.74 |
116 |  534.365 |    50.00 |
117 |  526.648 |    48.85 |
118 |  526.893 |    48.46 |
119 |  524.398 |    47.83 |
120 |  525.657 |    47.54 |
121 |  525.011 |    47.09 |
122 |  518.391 |    46.12 |
123 |  517.904 |    45.70 |
E|Lua.Exception|| *** FATAL LUA ERROR:
E|Lua.Exception|| lua/vehicle/main.lua:94: attempt to index global 'controller' (a nil value)
=============== Stack Traceback >> START >>
(1) metamethod C function '__index'
(2) Lua function 'onGraphicsStep' at file 'lua/vehicle/main.lua:94' (best guess)
  Local variables:
  dtSim = number: 0.05
  (*temporary) = nil
  (*temporary) = number: 1.32627e-311
  (*temporary) = number: 0.05
  (*temporary) = Lua function 'getRootPartOdometerValue' (defined at line 234 of chunk @lua/vehicle/partCondition.lua)
  (*temporary) = string: "attempt to index global 'controller' (a nil value)"
--------------- << END <<

E|Lua.Exception|| ******************************************
E|Lua.Exception|| *** DISABLING VEHICLE DUE TO EXCEPTION ***
E|Lua.Exception|| ******************************************
E|Lua.Exception|| *** vehicle/object error
124 |  521.379 |    45.63 |
125 |  512.578 |    44.50 |
126 |  509.799 |    43.91 |
127 |  505.457 |    43.19 |
128 |  515.506 |    43.71 |
129 |  506.274 |    42.59 |
130 |  502.871 |    41.98 |
131 |  497.780 |    41.24 |
132 |  493.244 |    40.55 |
133 |  494.648 |    40.36 |
134 |  498.713 |    40.39 |
135 |  493.110 |    39.64 |
136 |  490.571 |    39.15 |
137 |  488.472 |    38.70 |
138 |  477.489 |    37.55 |
139 |  473.108 |    36.94 |
140 |  475.494 |    36.86 |
141 |  464.536 |    35.76 |
142 |  466.103 |    35.62 |
143 |  459.384 |    34.87 |
144 |  464.046 |    34.97 |
145 |  457.767 |    34.26 |
146 |  457.075 |    33.98 |
147 |  457.481 |    33.78 |
148 |  452.915 |    33.21 |
149 |  447.649 |    32.61 |
150 |  442.927 |    32.05 |
Max Mbeams/s:   589.986 Mbeams/s

 BANANAA!!!
 .______,#
 \ -----'/
  `-----'
Press any key to continue . . .

 

548 vs 590 is thanks to closing services and programas...do not expect more.
Let us know when you make changes.

 

Anybody got a test for i9 10850K? And if so. How does it compair to ryzen 7 3700x, i5 12600k, and ryzen 9 3900x?
--- Post updated ---

Woops meant ryzen 7 5800x

 

Did a test on my R9 3900x some specs: Ram is running at 3200mhz and the CPU usually was at around 4ghz not to high conisdering the temps werent that high but it might have been bad luck in the silicone lottery

 

So here's the result for a Ryzen 7700X with 6000MHz CL40 Ram and PBO enabled. Stock clocks and air cooled by a Noctua NH-D15