BANANA Benchmark Results Comparison

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Just over clock in the BIOS its much more stable that way anyhow.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

(imported from here)

*cough*

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

do yo 5600k homes



A8 6600k @4.45

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

I don't have a BIOS, and my EFI has no overclocking option. Here's what I got running in the outdated and 32-bit version of Wine:

Pretty lame. And of course compiling the latest 64-bit Wine gave me two random syntax errors. Of course.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Pretty decent results for a stock i7 2700k in my opinion

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results



Totally stock non-overclocked blah...blah.
I'll believe this when I get 5 Moonhawks on DRI at 30FPS.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Set it to test the moonhawk

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

My a6-5400k is dual core, 2 threads, and I think all a6 cpu's are at this point.

http://products.amd.com/en-us/DesktopAPUDetail.aspx?id=48&f1=&f2=&f3=&f4=&f5=&f6=&

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Inetl core I3 4130 3.4 ghz
33.028 Mbeams/s

[v3|u| Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4130 CPU @ 3.40GHz (4 cores, 3392 MHz) | Tuesday 06/
24/14 11:08:53]
Beam ANAlysis NArrator, Version: 0.2
Test vehicle: vehicles/pickup
1 vehicles : 14.628 Mbeams/s, 205.16 % realtime
2 vehicles : 27.853 Mbeams/s, 195.32 % realtime
3 vehicles : 31.805 Mbeams/s, 148.69 % realtime
4 vehicles : 29.830 Mbeams/s, 104.59 % realtime
5 vehicles : 29.860 Mbeams/s, 83.76 % realtime
6 vehicles : 32.031 Mbeams/s, 74.87 % realtime
7 vehicles : 33.028 Mbeams/s, 66.18 % realtime
8 vehicles : 30.538 Mbeams/s, 53.54 % realtime
Max Mbeams/s: 33.028 Mbeams/s


BANANAA!!!
.______,#
\ -----'/
`-----'

And Underclocker at 0.80 ghz (energy saving mode)

[v3|u| Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4130 CPU @ 3.40GHz (4 cores, 3392 MHz) | Tuesday 06/
24/14 11:26:07]
Beam ANAlysis NArrator, Version: 0.2
Test vehicle: vehicles/pickup
1 vehicles : 3.610 Mbeams/s, 50.64 % realtime
2 vehicles : 6.266 Mbeams/s, 43.94 % realtime
3 vehicles : 7.394 Mbeams/s, 34.57 % realtime
4 vehicles : 7.003 Mbeams/s, 24.55 % realtime
5 vehicles : 6.065 Mbeams/s, 17.01 % realtime
6 vehicles : 7.302 Mbeams/s, 17.07 % realtime
7 vehicles : 7.544 Mbeams/s, 15.12 % realtime
8 vehicles : 6.967 Mbeams/s, 12.21 % realtime
Max Mbeams/s: 7.544 Mbeams/s


BANANAA!!!
.______,#
\ -----'/
`-----'

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Lol this benchmark... So your laptop CPU scores higher than mine but then your in-game performance is much slower than mine, so what's the point of this benchmark? Certainly not measure in-game performance.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

I believe this is just purely a cpu processing benchmark. Yeah while a computer can handle 5 cars cpu wise the gpu is another story.

Sent through the stars by my Galaxy with a Note for you!

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

i7 3770k 4.2GHz


i7 3770k 4.8GHz


i7 3770k 5.0GHz, I reached to thermal limits and i'm getting throttled, time to go back to 4.2GHz

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

i5 2500k @ 4.2

[v3|u| Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz (4 cores, 3300 MHz) | Tuesday 06
/24/14 11:51:19]
Beam ANAlysis NArrator, Version: 0.2
Test vehicle: vehicles/pickup
1 vehicles : 18.598 Mbeams/s, 260.84 % realtime
2 vehicles : 36.294 Mbeams/s, 254.52 % realtime
3 vehicles : 52.048 Mbeams/s, 243.33 % realtime
4 vehicles : 46.773 Mbeams/s, 164.00 % realtime
5 vehicles : 44.303 Mbeams/s, 124.27 % realtime
6 vehicles : 50.145 Mbeams/s, 117.22 % realtime
7 vehicles : 52.742 Mbeams/s, 105.68 % realtime
8 vehicles : 47.018 Mbeams/s, 82.43 % realtime
Max Mbeams/s: 52.742 Mbeams/s


BANANAA!!!
.______,#
\ -----'/
`-----'
Press any key to continue . . .

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Nice! I dont think i'll add the 5GHz result to the doc, since its performing worse than the 4.8GHz result. Would be nice to see that kind of clocks with the cooling capacity to not throttle them!

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Nadeox has some problem with his CPU. In the CPU performance drive thread we already noticed he was getting really low fps, and here we can see that his CPU (i5 2500k) is performing as a Q6600 with the same clocks, when I have the same CPU (i5 2500k) and I'm getting more than double his score.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Yep, definitely seems too low. Maybe poor cooling, lots of dust and its thermal throttling?

Or perhaps Turbo boost is turned off?

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results


Bonana

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results



I really need to get some money for i5..

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

I noticed that we both have the 2500k and Nateox has the regular 2500.

@3.3 = 26.096 <<Nateox seems rather low
@4.0 = 51.347 = 96.76% increase over 3.3
@4.2 = 52.742 = 2.71% increase over 4.0
@4.6 = 57.579 = 9.17% increase over 4.2

From 4.0 to 4.6 equals a 12.13% performance increase. Take the 2.71% increase from 4.0 to 4.2 and divide by 2 for a 1.35%.

Now adding the 12.13 + 1.35 gives 13.48% for the 3.3GHz to 4.0GHz difference of 0.7Ghz

Using the above information gives a better representation of data

@3.3 = 44.426 = Default clock speed estimation
@4.0 = 51.347 = 13.48% increase over 3.3
@4.2 = 52.742 = 2.71% increase over 4.0
@4.6 = 57.579 = 9.17% increase over 4.2


Attached is a screenshot showing both Davidbc and myself have 2500K vs Nateox regular 2500... The K is simply an unlocked edition which can be over-clocked all the CPU's are technically the same but thought I would add that in.

 

Re: BANANA Bench (Beam ANAlysis NAarrator) Results

Oc'd to 4.6ghz, and got amazing results, I forgot to mention, my last test had turbo disabled, so it didnt ramp up to 3.9ghz under load or anything, so it was just flat 3.5ghz for the last one.
Intel Core i7 2700k again