1. Dismiss Notice
  2. GPU Fatal Error? Intel HD Graphics 620/630 Crashes? Help us solve them!
    Dismiss Notice

Latest Reviews

  1. tobias95ng
    tobias95ng
    5/5,
    Version: 1.11
    Realy good revamp i was missing it a lot and it is finaly a standalone good work the body shape is ecelent it fits perfectly together

    Thank you :D
    1. NinetyNine!
      Author's Response
      Thank you for the kind review!
  2. RandsomeGaming
    RandsomeGaming
    5/5,
    Version: 08_10_2019
    I would love to install this but i am 100% sure my pc will legit shit it self. I am giving a good rating because it seems good and if you're like me and you like to roleplay with ai xD, Too bad i can't install it i might give it a go and see if i can run it. Keep it up man.
    1. bob.blunderton
      Author's Response
      This will run on a very old system with a used 30$ (in 2016) Radeon 1GB 6750 - on a FIRST GENERATION 2009-era i7. Seriously.
      Set on low or lowest details if you have 1GB of VRAM. You just need to make sure that your system has 6~8GB of system memory (different from VRAM) and you'll be okay, as I'm unsure if it will run with 4GB only.
      That being said, I'm only using <2GB of memory while in the map editor, so even if you have 4GB of system RAM, try it out. If you get an 0xFFFFFFFF error from BeamNG and a crash to desktop, then purchase some more memory for the computer - it's usually pretty cheap especially on older machines.
      THIS IS MADE TO RUN ON LOW/OLDER/ OTHERWISE MARGINAL SPEC MACHINES!
      You don't know until you try! Let me know in the comments how well or if it works. As long as your processor is half-decent and you don't try to run too many AI vehicles (for your system processor, video, and system memory specifications), you will be just fine to drive around and enjoy this map.
      A lady friend of mine had an HP / COMPAQ business-class machine, with an i7 950, 6gb of 1333mhz RAM, a used Radeon 6750 1gb DDR3 card, and a hard disk drive. It took a little while to load, but otherwise, on lowest it was 60fps (capped), and 30fps on LOW (while using up all the VRAM on 'low'). This was *BEFORE* I did the optimizations (and also added more size to the city and a bit more detail), so it may even run quite a bit better now, the game was also optimized afterwords, too.
      With a resounding WOW she said it was quite playable/enjoyable and was shocked how well it ran.
      It's a city, with the details you want and need, and little to none of what you don't need. This keeps the FPS - and hence the enjoyment - up.
      So again, TRY IT.
      --Good luck
  3. LegoMarcusR
    LegoMarcusR
    5/5,
    Version: 1.1
    So amazing keep up the great work! Looking forward to ECUSA!
  4. TopKick
    TopKick
    5/5,
    Version: 1.0
    The amount of options is amazing! All around great mod and I look forward to more updates! Also: Figured I'd rate this real quick so the rating that idiot below me made doesn't make the mod rating look bad.
  5. Declan Cole
    Declan Cole
    1/5,
    Version: 1.0
    there is no ground it is all black but the containers are there
    1. LEGUSHA
      Author's Response
      Hi. Now i know how to fix this problem, In the next week will be update!
  6. Coshei
    Coshei
    5/5,
    Version: 1997
    Super :)
    1. Very nice cars
      Author's Response
      Dziękuje
  7. Fullsize
    Fullsize
    5/5,
    Version: 1.0
    It's inspired by what brand / modèle ???
    1. Hunter Atkins
      Author's Response
      Cadillac DTS
  8. Fullsize
    Fullsize
    5/5,
    Version: 1.0
    Perfect job
  9. Fullsize
    Fullsize
    5/5,
    Version: 1.0
    I love your mod
  10. Fullsize
    Fullsize
    5/5,
    Version: 1.0
    Good idea : )
  11. Fullsize
    Fullsize
    5/5,
    Version: 0.10
    Perfect
  12. Fullsize
    Fullsize
    5/5,
    Version: 0.11
    VERY NICE : )
  13. Sparks4
    Sparks4
    5/5,
    Version: 08_10_2019
    This map is amazing, even though I haven't spent much time on it, I already like it.

    Performance is actually okay, considering the fact I am playing at 4k maxed, my GTX 970 (even though it is heavily overclocked) - it still managed to get an average of 35-40fps on the highest settings. Minus reflections.

    My specs for those who are curious:

    I7-2600 @3.9ghz
    8GBs DDR3 1600mhz
    MSI GTX 970 Gaming 4G (Bios modded, and overclocked)
    Benq 28in EL2870U

    One thing to note is the ram and VRAM usage... My VRAM was pegged at 3.8gbs and 4 throughout my time in-game which makes sense. My ram usage though was pegged at 7.8/8gbs most of the time in-game before my system went into the page file - dropping my ram usage.

    Considering my PC is rather outdated, and still managed to get above 30-40fps, on this map is amazing. Those who have better hardware than mine and play on lower resolutions, will easily run this map.

    Some screenshots of my settings and in-game photos, I also included an MSI afterburner photo showing my systems resources, ram, VRAM, GPU usage, CPU usage, clock speeds, etc;
    https://imgur.com/a/1uz4VxP
    1. bob.blunderton
      Author's Response
      Switching to medium texture detail should make everything run much better, but you can keep the mesh quality up max, because I used lots of fps-improving tricks in making them.
      Above-all, THANK YOU Sir, for taking the time to make a super-duper detailed post in your review about performance (seriously, these help LOTS and LOTS).
      Your CPU is just dandy yet (surely showing it's age a bit, but you don't have to put her out to pasture yet if you don't want to), RAM is just enough, and VRAM will definitely be maxed as this uses 5.5~6.0gb or so, not including what the OS and web browser and other apps will have loaded in also (can be as much as 1.5gb especially if you have another simple game like Rimworld running in the background as I sometimes do). If on medium texture detail, you should easily be able to fit this map into the 3.5gb 'faster' section of VRAM on that card (the last 512mb of the 4gb is a bit slower than the first 3.0gb and following 512mb section, due to less links to the gpu core for the latter sections).
      So again, do enjoy, and above all, thanks a million. I spent months refining the performance (about 8~12 weeks or so, on and off, mostly about 2 months worth beginning of last Winter).
  14. Very nice cars
    Very nice cars
    4/5,
    Version: 2008
    Te przednie lampy ahh... Tył spoko
    1. Martin.S
      Author's Response
      Dzięki za ocenę :)
  15. Very nice cars
    Very nice cars
    5/5,
    Version: 1.0
    Excellent
    1. Coshei
      Author's Response
      Thank you :)
  16. Very nice cars
  17. Chance Barber
    Chance Barber
    5/5,
    Version: 1.1
    Love this mod but I have an issue with the 2.0 i5 for the Covet and the 2.2l i5 for the I series. Idk how to describe it other than can you fix the power bands and the torque converter behaviors? The cars start acceleration and go off the line way to slow even when trying to do booster launches. Love the sound of the 5 cylinders though but the powerbands need work. Otherwise this is an insane mod and I definitely use this for personal real life like roleplay games.
    1. Kueso
      Author's Response
      nice too hear!
      also 1.2 is addressing this issue, the turbo's spooled too slow at low RPMS and the torque converters were way to aggressive
      Thanks though!
  18. TheCrySick
    TheCrySick
    5/5,
    Version: 1.0
    Well, I have to say that I really enjoy driving it! Nice work!
    1. Thombike
      Author's Response
      Thanks. I always try my best and look to my car are not just powerful but driveable too. Try other ones :)
  19. nowysen
    nowysen
    1/5,
    Version: 2.0
    terrible.
  20. ForZac
    ForZac
    5/5,
    Version: 1.1
    actually insane, very nice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice