Chevrolet, by far. one car burned in the driveway, the 2nd needed all the pistons replaced & the A/C was shot after a few months another had the same A/C issue again, and rust everywhere
my brother drives a 1987 Mazda 626 coupe 5 spd, cant find parts anywhere, but its a really nice one, 110k granny driven, well optioned and in the rarest body style, the limited production coupe and the rarest paint code "Missouri Blue" gets 43 mpg highway in our experience 2.0L EFI when you do a google image search for 1987 mazda 626 coupe, one of the few good pictures out there is a picture of my brother's car before he bought it. here is that picture
Ford Europe, even the new cars are poorly made, ugly, expensive and slow. at least old ones like the old Mondeo had some character and are very tough
I couldn't agree more. I've never owned a GM, but the bastards still managed to get me when we had a Chevy Malibu rental. Broke down, and even before it broke down it felt like an expensive five-year-old Camry. Except Camrys don't break down...
Bullsh*t. --- Post updated --- And I like the styling of it and the next models, just not the wagons. It would be kinda accurate if you changed the picture to a Passat B3
Too be honest, I like boxy cars, that was a joke. Supercar manufactures are the worst! WHAT IS PRACTICLE ABOUT THIS?
And I li No, I didn't mean that. More like sharp-angle cars look better than cars that are curvy like a multipla.
For the first model. And there are over 800 differences including engine(OHC vs OHV), clutch(hydraulic vs cable -operated), brakes(Drums vs Discs because reasons...), metal thickness(thicker , to survive the climate) and suspension(reinforced). There are articles describing most of them.
you clearly cant read, i just wrote that they bought the design off fiat. i know they heavily modified it for russian the marked, but the looks remained almost identical
