WCUSA RUN LIKE BUTTER

Hi, i just wanna know why is my pc lagging the least on wcusa than other maps, seriously, here are my fps in industrial: 15-30(like a lot of maps like ecusa, italy and small island) and wcusa: 40-50
same setting and setup, here are my specs if it has something to do with it (of course it has to lol):

gpu: just bought a quadro k2200 for some budget reasons
cpu: intel core i5-4690S without igpu, running at 3.8 ghz instead of 3.2
ram: 16gb 1600mhz ddr3
useless for this but still, HDD: 2tb 2010's hitachi hard drive

maybe the quadro but idk so please help

 

same, i wonder why

 

yeah cuz people says it's the most intensive map, so posted the thread
--- Post updated ---
maybe because the quadro is a proffesionnal card and it was made to load more intensive things easier, idk just saying that randomly

 

maybe idk, but muye is on pc and said on vid that it was the most intensive map
--- Post updated ---
so maybe the game engine
--- Post updated ---
maybe it was made to run smooth on older high-end/mid-end setups

 

System overhead most likely. Some maps use more RAM than others (DDR3-1600 is *very* slow these days) and I expect the RAM to be *one* of the culprits here. Intel 4th-Gen is nearly a decade old, and today's mid-end CPUs are 2 to 3x faster. IMHO there's not a lot you can do here unless you are willing to spend 300 - 500 bucks on significantly updated hardware. Not to mention that running the OS from an HDD is a big no-no for today's operating systems.

 

idk how but as i said 40 fps is smooth, here are the settings too

mesh: normal
texture: low
lightning: low
shadow visibility: all
post processing quality: custom
anisotropic filtering: off
AA mode: fxaa
bloom:checked
AO:checked
LR:checked
DF:checked
MB:checked
mb:50%
dynamic reflexion: on
resolution: 512px
UR:2
detail:8
distance:800m
tiremarks amount: 4000
grass density:0.75

with 3 running cars (without the player) and 40fps, all of this is useles, but it's still good for 10 years old
--- Post updated ---

and yes, 8 years old
--- Post updated ---
off topic but, on which part should i spent 125 euros? Do you think it's enough for a decent RAM and SSD? btw is there some types of ram adaptaters for sale?windows is around 30-50 gb, so 80gb should be enough for SSD
--- Post updated ---
i just realised that it's long but it could be way smaller

 

To be fair you're much better off updating to an Intel 8th-gen i7 or better and DDR4-3200 memory than attempting to upgrade your current platform. 80 GB SSD's are utter trash, get a 500 GB or larger. They will last much longer.

 

so, bigger they are longer they last?
--- Post updated ---
got a sencond question, i don't have the money to buy a new motherboard with ram now, but anyway, on my pc i got 1 normal sata port, and 4 raid ports, which should i use for ssd and which for hard drive?
--- Post updated ---
oops forgot to mention something: i only got an 80+ gold 240w psu and made a meme about overpriced cpu's

Imgflip

 

it's more about the fact that you won't run out of space as fast, for the second question check your motherboard's manual.

 

which manual?
--- Post updated ---
searched on acer's website, didn't found the good one

 

what PC do you have?