To everyone who believes the Chiron is a turd; you are all wrong, and my Veyron rant still applies. http://www.beamng.com/threads/bugatti-veyron-sucks.8097/#post-110905
Well, I think it's alright. It takes some getting used to the looks, and the rear is really different (but I don't dislike it). I think it looks cooler and more menacing than the Veyron. The two-tone colour scheme actually looks good here, unlike the Veyron... I think it's a pretty good success this car in the way of styling, with throwbacks to the old 1930's Atlantique. I would choose this over the Veyron every day since that looks terrible in comparison to the Chrion.
Yeah... But in the old days of the first renault Twingo or the peugeot 106 This quality was gone faaaaar away (In france, many of the Lada-jokes about quality are with Twingos)
This one definetly looks better than a veyron,the rear is much better quality,i do however like the headlights,BUUUTTT i perfer a 1990s/early 2000s dodge viper or ferarri 575m
THe Cayman GT4 and the Targa are pretty nice in my opinion. (The biggest advantage is that they cost 10-20 times less than a Chiron and you can actually drive them.)
its the same as the veyron, but slower because of the electronic speed limit that they added for "safety reasons"
Also Koenigsegg. Agera RS: One:1 ($6m b*tches, pulls two Gs): Regera (no gearbox, purely electric until 70 kph): Total fanboy right now.