Fahrfreude WC200 1.9

Recent Reviews

1. 
   G-Farce

   2/5,

   Version: 1.9

   Pains me to give it a two star rating, but I do like the concept. And your photos are nice.
   
   I drove it. Problem is it still looks like a concept.
   What's Corsa ESC? It's much better
   No hole/gap where the exhaust comes out
   
   Not a fan of the front grille. Front and rear fascia could be more polished & detailed. That's really my biggest complaint. Apart from the sound being rather uninspiring. I do like the lack of power though. Shouldn't comment on the handling since I was terrible at driving it, spinning out was a bit too easy. But I want to see you improve your designs by adding more detail rather than leaving them looking a bit too empty
   
   If you get the front and rear faces looking detailed, you can kind of get away with skimping on the rest, assuming you want to make the car realistic...that said the mirrors are about an inch or two too small.

   Nov 9, 2019 at 12:33 PM
2. 
   akindofcat

   1/5,

   Version: 1.9

   Gotta be honest with you, if your design language consists of lacking a diffuser, a license plate dent and many more details that a normal road going car has, you should really study some real life car designs. Cars are a form of art and they take skill to be made into something beautiful. One of the skills a good designer has is the capacity to combine various design elements that seem unfitting and turn them into something that works out flawlessly. Take this as a tip.

   Nov 8, 2019 at 11:53 PM

   1. 
      Author's Response

      Did you even drive the car?

3. 
   Martin.S

   2/5,

   Version: 1.8

   Can you add more details because Your cars looks The same

   Jul 3, 2019

   1. 
      Author's Response

      No, there aren't that many fixtures I like and I don't want to have inconsistencies in the Fahrfreude design language