BANANA Benchmark Results Comparison

I know that, i ment that my bottleneck on the game is my GPU.

 

i was expecting worse...

 

So is the real time figure this tests 30fps or 60fps? Or am I totally missing the point of this benchmark?

 

The physics engine runs at 2000fps.

So neither.

 

Oh wow thanks!!

My i7 4790k @4.2ghz gets 169

 

don't have an ssd yet
You can see my specs in my signature
Gird map pure one car I get 350fps
west coast USA 36fps with one car and with 10 cars

The limter was turned on when on west coast USA
but it can run 22 car at 60fps but not in a group in a group I get about 12fps now what I need is dual graphic card

 

My Ryzen 5 1600 just arrived today. I initially tried to IG stress test and only got 8 pigeons. I was confused, but grateful (vs my 30fps with 2 trucks). I then discovered that 4 of my cores were disabled. I over clocked this puppy to 4ghz. Here you go:

 

What sort of RAM you have ? That has quite a lot of impact on the performance as well with Ryzen. I'm running my 1600 in 3.8 GHz and I get over 190 Mbeams/s

 

Bloody poser..... at least do what the title says and post your Banana Bench result

 

He did, he used the ingame one. Second row on the right hand side of the specs in the first picture.

Not sure how good/functional the ingame tester is though and it does miss alot of details.

 

Sorry I don't now where the banana benchmarker is

 

Look at the first post

 

There you go

 

It's actually a xeon E5 2650 v3 ES which goes up to 2.4GHz on it's 10 cores. 1.17 MBeam per dollar on a cpu I got 2 years ago

I'm looking to upgrade it tho, I can get a E5 2699 v4 on the "cheap" but 2.3GHz is terrible...
A threadripper 1950x would mean new ~300$ mobo + 1000$ cpu ; a new xeon with 20 cores at 3,2GHz would cost me 1800$ minimum

I think I'l just buy a new monitor

 

2133 8gb. It overclocks to 2400 though I also have the cpu stable at 3.9ghz
--- Post updated ---
New banana

 

not bad for a 6 year old 4 core cpu with no hyperthreading of any form IMHO

 

Okay. I have 2666 memories running at 2933 at the moment, we have similar results.

 

found some old benchmarks, including some of different vehicles, so i took some new of the same vehicles (and one of the semi-truck) to show how much better the optimisation has gotten physics wise:



and the new one for the pickup:



now the moonhawk OLD:



and moonhawk new:



and just for fun, the semi-truck:



so on the physics side of things, the game has made huge leaps and bounds over the original release indeed

 

Interesting. I did some tests with Ryzen 5 1600 today, disabled SMT support from the BIOS to see how it affects to the performance. Also had installed a lot more recent BIOS, since the previous one was from last year, around August-October (0909). Pretty interesting differences.


No SMT:




With SMT:






Also, with the new BIOS, I managed to put more speed to my RAM (stock speed is 2666, previosly ran at 2933, now capable of running at 3066), so my overall MBeam-result improved about 10-15 MBeams, which is also pretty significant difference. I might try to do some more overclocking, right now the 3.8 Ghz is a sort of stable 24/7 overclock setting, but you never know how well it would work with these latests bioses.

 

That is Simultaneous Multithreading.....that really does make an increase in performance from your results...