BANANA Benchmark Results Comparison

I'm hoping to do a hardline loop before ocing, at which point I want to hit 4ghz or if lucky 4.5ghz on all 10 cores it'll be great. but I dont think I'll risk it till I have the cooling to play with.

 

Let's see if "bumping" the thread makes more people post their results...



Decided to test on my laptop, it has a i7 4510u @ 2.0ghz



Did 3 runs, this was the best one

56.965 MBeans/s

 

Here is my benchmark, i7-6700k at 4.40GHz
Got 167.085 Mbeams/s

 

Ryzen 1700 OC @ 3.6, Stock Cooler too if anyone wondered.

Max Mbeams/s = 255.473

 

Those couple extra cores pushes the performance beyond 200 Mbeams/s. Last time I tried with R5 1600 in 3.9 was about 195. Gotta try it again, if the Banana has been updated now.

 

Did a couple tests on my laptop. Fans were at 100% all the time.
3.5ghz on all 4 cores. Max temperature was recorded at 75°C with core voltage of 0.985V. Max Mbeams/s: 134.344

2.8ghz, max temperature 57°C, core voltage 0.821V, max Mbeams/s: 106.405


Insane how such low clockspeeds result in over 100 mbeams/s. In early 2016 I couldn't get over 60 even with overclocking

 

254.860 Mbeams/s @ (stock) Ryzen 1800X

 

Wow! how did you score so much higher than me? I'm clocked to 4.4 and got this

 

I don't know if rest of PC matters in this test too, but CPU is liquid cooled, and rest looks like this: 16GB @ 3100MHz CL14, using only fast SSDs and GTX 1070 OCed to hell.
Tests were made after rebooting PC without any unnecessary apps running in background i.ex. notepad, steam, cpu/gpu monitoring programs etc. and overall health of PC and system is perfect.

I'll retest later today and we'll see current v0.11.0.2 score

 

Good idea. I'm also watercooled and using a gtx980 lightly OCed. Did you manually overclock? I am using the asrock auto OC in bios and perhaps it's not as efficient as a proper overclock.

 

Manually - all cores locked to 4.5 GHz, ring set @ 4.4GHz, ofc find the best voltage and if you wanna continue conversation go and send me a PM, to keep the thread clean from non subject informative posts

Ps. BeamNG.drive is suprisingly great benchamark tool for overclocking. My CPU was able to handle all CPU benchmarks and stuff like prime95 @ 4.7GHz stable, but when I was playing some CPU intensive games it got some little issues like micro lags etc both with 4.7 and 4.6 GHz but any major crashes so I thought it was a problem with GPU OC. I got it to non-OC stage and problem was still present. Later I tested BeamNG.drive with 14 pickups and yet it was only stable with 4.5GHz, then tested all other games with 4.5GHz and problems were gone, as BeamNG have shown - the real limit of this CPU with this setup is 4.5GHz


@eDiT: Current score is 164 MBeams/s vs previous game version 0.10 153 MBeam/s. That mean in my case I got 7.2% of performance uplift 17 pickups over 100% realtime on 4c/4t CPU. NEAT! And nothing has changed to PC it just got older and dirtier inside. - I'll update this post with some comparison like I used to do

 

Kinda did an update over the old CPU. The jump is MASSIVE.

This is my old one

Best MBeans/s was 63, avg 52.
Now its max 115 agv 100. x2 increase in speed.

 

Pretty good I guess
--- Post updated ---

64 GB of RAM? Running a server or just braging?

 

XEONs are magic..

Funny thing
Spawned in Gridmap, made a Gavril-T with 3 trailers (been doing that to test how much Gavril can haul. Turns out, a LOT!!)
26-30 FPS stable. "Eh, pretty good I guess. Didnt expect FPS to rise considerably."
Began switching cars. Turned out I already had spawned one Gavril-T and 3 trailers... So I had 30FPS with 2 Gavrils, and 6 trailers.
Literally squealed with joy

 

Not too shabby.


CPU in my signature.

 

OC'ed 1700 gets close
What is your RAM speed? mine is at ~3000

 

Gotta make it a mission to beat the Ryzen 1700 now lol. This was at 4.7GHz, but I might be able to get a run in at over 5.

 

Pretty respectable for a laptop at 3.8gHz

 

Here is my banana:


My bottleneck is the GPU

 

Banana is a CPU only benchmark. Your GPU has no effect on the score.