FPS in Drive?

What kind of fps are you getting? What is your setup? I am using a sapphire radeon HD 7950 vapor-x, the amd fx 8350, and three 24" monitors. I'm getting a solid 45 fps on the highest settings! Tell me about yours!!

 

i5 2500k @ 3.7 Ghz, 8 GB RAM, 2GB Radeon 7870 @ 1920x1080. It looks like I get a pretty consistent 24 fps with everything maxed out (graphics settings, PostFX, the works).

Although, I'm not sure how to check the FPS directly. I wouldn't suppose there is a console command by chance?

 

press ctrl + F to see the FPS

i have an old dual core intel e6750 at 3.0 ghz and a nvidia 260gtx and i get about 25 fps on the demo and about 20 fps on drive ( deoending on the car and terrain (15-30 fps))

 

If I just use one screen I get a solid 56-60.

 

To make a useful comparison you'd have to at least be on the same map and view similar scenes and the same car. Where possible replays are used to make such comparisons.

 

I was just talking about in general, not a scientific experiment

 

Oh, sorry. I would have liked to participate and show everything my rats can do!

Here you go:

specs
i7 920 @ 3.60 GHz
GTX 680


settings
Resolution: 1920x1080
Fullscreen: disabled
Borderless: disabled
Mesh Quality: High
Texture Quality: High
Leighting Quality: High
Anisotropic Filtering: 16x
Anti-aliasing: 4x
Shader Quality: High
PostFX: Completely off (Default in this version)

Measured via fraps and received the following stats doing a lap on rock island with the Ibishu covet rally config on BeamNG version 0.3.02 (with the third update):

Min: 28
Max: 74
Avg: 49.816

Note the improvement from back here with the second update applied.

 

It would be interesting to have a set of guidelines that define an experiment to see what kind of FPS different systems get!

 

You just quoted some set of guidelines yourself.

If we were to do another one I'd recommend low settings so that a wide variety can participate. (And move into a scientific thread )

 

I know I just quoted one set But would you like to create the thread or would you like me to? What set of guidelines should we use?

 

If you want to do a more accurate comparison I'll leave you with the privilege to open a separate thread. I meant that last part as a joke.

As long as there is no replay system you'd have to do an accurate comparison by doing some camera routes via lua, if that's even possible. I've never taken a look at the documentation. From the specs I would probably do three sets. One for compatibility with everything disabled or set to the lowest setting, one for hardware with a wider support range, where everything is turned on but still to the lowest setting and one with everything on and set to the highest option.
The resolution would have to be the same for everybody in all cases.

 

i read that wrong i thought it said specific thread thats what i get for quick reading on my iphone! But on a more serious note, I do think that getting an idea as to what kind of FPS people are getting would be interesting and fun. You should come up with a set of guidelines that people can follow. Then they report back to tell us the results. You seem to know how to go about doing it, so if you dont mind would you create the guidelines?

 

It does say "specific thread".

We're going a little off-topic here. Let's discuss the rest via PM.

 

VSync on, always 60 fps on highest settings.

 

Are you aware that that is, because you have VSync on?

 

mmmm yeah -.-

Thanks

 

He means he gets a smooth consistent 60 fps. Which is good. The FPS bouncing around is really annoying.

Also if I turn off PostFX, I get a pretty consistent 60 fps. Those really take a toll on your system if you don't have an amazing machine.

 

There was no offence intended.
I don't know anything about you, so I would rather give somebody advice he already has, than leaving a stranger in some mystical belief.

Btw. what map are you testing on?


@Demache: Enabling vSync will cap your frame queue to the refresh rate of you monitor (rather what you have set it to in the options), causing it not only to avoid screen tearing, but also avoiding the frame-rate to change as long as your system can keep up with the refresh rate, which makes it smooth.
So if you have it enabled then disabling PostFX might just have brought you to that edge.

 

I understand

All maps Constant 60 fps in all of them.

 

25-35FPS with my laptop :

Toshiba laptop L850 core i7 and HD radeon 7670M 1Gb.

Graphic setting :

All low setting except texture resolution up to 1366x768.
Disable SSAO, post FX and antialising !

So distance view is not good but is a little configuration !