1. Trouble with the game?
    Try the troubleshooter!

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Issues with the game?
    Check the Known Issues list before reporting!

    Dismiss Notice

Collision physics development?

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by SuchSneak, Aug 1, 2020.

  1. P_enta

    P_enta
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2020
    Messages:
    3,029
    True. The deformation isnt nearly detailed enough for low speed
     
  2. _Tanco

    _Tanco
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2017
    Messages:
    247
    I think that's the right decision to let as much people as possible to play the game decently with at least one car :), and more the time passes, more the average computer will get powerfull, so beamng will be able to improve their cars quality. I believe you never thought in 2012 that you will do one day a car as complex as the cherrier FCV because it would be too hard to handle for the majority of the computers. (remember the good old days were a GTX780 was a high end powerfull graphic card ? Now it's just an average/low end component that became really cheap)
     
  3. esesel

    esesel
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2019
    Messages:
    741
    Silicon performance improvement don't only come from smaller nodes, it's largely the architecture, and streamlined code that contribute to performance gains, beyond 1 nm nodes speed increase will have to come from innovation, rather than iteration. Stuff like carbon nano tubes different die materials etc will be the replacement for Moore's law
     
  4. TYLERTJ

    TYLERTJ
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2013
    Messages:
    670
    A developer in the past said that this isn’t possible without creating extremely complex and performance heavy j beams. I think it could be done fairly realistically with textures and normal maps, though.
     
  5. TrackpadUser

    TrackpadUser
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2019
    Messages:
    468
    The issue is the jbeam system is what manages deformation and it doesn't interface with materials, excluding glow maps and deform groups, which just change a material for an other.

    Deform groups are pretty much an all or nothing thing for an entire mesh, which is probably part of why there isn't really a scratch system using them other than some experimental attempts.

    And having the bumper cave in like this on impacts requires designing a "reversal" in the jbeam, the issue is that jbeam reversals tend to deform the mesh in weird ways, so it probably would never look as good as in the picture.
     
    #25 TrackpadUser, Aug 13, 2020
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2020
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. TYLERTJ

    TYLERTJ
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2013
    Messages:
    670
    Yes, I understand all of that. But, it’s only a matter of time before deformation textures get implemented. I dont see why you couldn’t use normal maps for these as well. It’s a pipeline dream, but it would be really impressive if implemented well. I trust the devs
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice