1969-1971 Beaufort V12 Specs : V12 9.0L at 4900 rpm 420hp 0-60 mph : 6.2s Speed : 250 km/h Note : Muscle : 13,7 Muscle Premium : 79 Gallery :
1967-1968 Proto Motors Coupe MkI 427 V8 Specs: V8 7.0L at 5100rpm 321hp 1357 kg 0-60 mph : 6.5s Speed : 235 km/h/146 mph Note : Muscle : 107,6 Muscle Premium : 82,9 Gallery :
1970-1973 Beaufort V10 V10 474ci 281hp only 13L/100km, the most economical muscle car 0-60 mph : 6.1s speed max : 241 km/h
but this is the first V10 in 1970, because this is the most economical car, --- Post updated --- 1969 Ford Mustang Boss 302 290hp at 5700rpm 7.2s (0-60 mph) 6300rpm 229 km/h 1680kg 82.2 in muscle car --- Post updated --- which do you prefer in a muscle car : I4, V6, V8, V10, V12, V16 or a W18 Bugatti EB118
V8, also a V10 is not economical... just sayin --- Post updated --- That is'nt the beast replica, the 302 had back stripes, louvers, a completely different grille, it looks more like a Mustang II
and my favorite engine in muscle car is the V12 or the V16, because you can drag with its 3200hp-5500hp, but this is the largest size, W18 of EB118 is too large
Other than V8 i consider that as super car, rather than muscle. What i consider as muscle here is american crossplane V8.(flatplane is what you found on ferrari,Bmw,and such) But v8(and less) with small/compact body is a pony I will gets deeper later down in this quantum entangled comment,so bear with me. Thats why no one calls the V8 toyota Soarer a muscle or pony car. Also for me viper is NOT a Real Muscle car Or a super. Sure it has the feels of muscle car. And rather muscle than Super. But its performace is enough to put it on supercar level. But it does not luxurious as most super do. Plus Games has the habit putting Viper on Muscle class. For me Viper is just partialy muscle(i will explain later down there). but i think its up to you wether its a muscle or a supercar. it didnt bother me as this argument already exsist since its lauch date. The mercedes SLS its a supercar. It has a V8 6.2 which is enough for a muscle Its heavy as hecc,yet thicc. But unlike Viper, this thing goes up to 500k , but the base just 135k. The base Viper just 100k, and ACR goes 'only' 120k If Big V8 is used as the only characteristic of muscle car A v8 soarer is a muscle,the ferrari cali is a muscle, the SLS and GT is a muscle and such.it wont work. For me personaly, i divide 2 types of muscle: True muscle and partial muscle. But first we need to look at what makes a car a muscle. -Big V8(important) -RWD -good at straight line but worst at everything else.(important) -rather low priced.(important) -environmental activist's worst enemy. -MURICAN! -True muscle is a car that fits with all characteristic or muscle.(Cuda,Charger RT, corvettes) -Partial muscle is any car with lots of characteristic of muscle but not all. -the viper has most of it but its only has V10 and way too expensive than average muscle. Yes im aware that Hellcats cost up to 80k but the base hellcat is just around 60k. -the SLS is had most of it, but its good around corner and has high price tag.and its mercedes,so... its not even partialy muscle -this also applies to my Penumbra, even it has all it need to be a true muscle,but it made by Force which is a asian based company, so yeah.... Bonus -10% muscle: any RWD V8 Just kidding. Its all purely my opinion based on facts i know, but i might be wrong at some point. And yes, just becaue its'My OPINION' Doesnt mean its BulletProof. Feel free to put your own opinion on mine. Also Opinions needs to be based on facts you know. For me most of your car @miangemidemon666 is a partial muscle. As most of it use ironicaly large V12/V10. Only the Proto coupe was a 'true' muscle. Its up to you to decide.
Beaufort Villeneuve MkIV Base : Low-end Muscle car (PONY) 2007-2013 3.2 V6 291hp 0-60 mph : 6.1s 265 km/h 1722kg Only 53 in pony and 46 in muscle because it's a liftback!
