BANANA Benchmark Results Comparison

Seems to be quite low compared to others on here? Or am I just expecting too much?

 

My results on my ThinkPad T61 ~ Core 2 duo T8300, 4Gb's RAM, nVidia Quadro 140m 128Mb gfx.

 

Cool, just updated my results, although it made little difference to my old Q6600

If anyone else wants to update their results, feel free!



- - - Updated - - -

Nope, seems very normal to me. Your Mbeams/s/Core/GHz is on point with all the other 4 core Haswells

 

I don't know if this is good or not:


ps: it says 2.7Ghz but it is one of those turbo i7's so it can acutaully do 3.7Ghz

 

I think the clockspeed listed for the mobile CPU variants should be the turbo one, since they are all at the top of the list because the listed clocks are the base clocks.

 

results using the new version of banana bench (will do pickup and moonhawk for my results)



and moonhawk:




hmm, i wonder what estama's results would be

 

I thought it was strange all the mobile CPUs at the top, ill change it to the turbo speeds.

Although i should also change it for all the CPUs, since i think most 'stock' speeds will be on turbo speeds.

 

The main problem is that not everyone will have the same turbo speeds, on laptops they might be throttled down, and then overclocking is basically increasing turbo clocks. The best way to check the clock the CPU is running at is for the user to look at CPUz or similar or for the benchmark to measure CPU frequency itself. :\ If its a desktop CPU, I think it is safe to assume that the clock will be approximately 1 bin (100MHz) less than the advertised maximum turbo frequency, for laptops its maybe harder to guess.

 

Not many xeons here :/

Code:

[v3|u| Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v3 @ 3.30GHz (8 cores, 3293 MHz) | Wednesday 06/25/14 21:49:36]
Beam ANAlysis NArrator, Version: 0.2
Test vehicle:  vehicles/pickup
1 vehicles  :  16.167 Mbeams/s, 226.61 % realtime
2 vehicles  :  29.307 Mbeams/s, 205.41 % realtime
3 vehicles  :  42.247 Mbeams/s, 197.40 % realtime
4 vehicles  :  43.511 Mbeams/s, 152.48 % realtime
5 vehicles  :  49.374 Mbeams/s, 138.42 % realtime
6 vehicles  :  59.486 Mbeams/s, 138.97 % realtime
7 vehicles  :  62.565 Mbeams/s, 125.29 % realtime
8 vehicles  :  50.793 Mbeams/s, 89.00 % realtime
9 vehicles  :  45.300 Mbeams/s, 70.55 % realtime
10 vehicles  :  47.769 Mbeams/s, 66.96 % realtime
Max Mbeams/s:  62.565 Mbeams/s


 BANANAA!!!
 .______,#
 \ -----'/
  `-----'
Press any key to continue . . .

 

Isn't that pretty much a 4770?
I retested with the new one and nothing changed obviously so now I need to overclock more.
Get reket

 

Ahem full picture please...

 

I wasn't using cones.

 

(imported from here)

Gonna overclock a little bit here (Probably 4.5GHz) and try that. Maybe.

 

Yeah pretty much. A little lower frequency and no integrated graphics. And a lot cheaper price

 

wow, i think nasa made my pc (Totally didn't use barriers instead of an actual vehicle, nope, not at all)

 

1. Toshiba Notebook again quite nice performance see attachment
2. PC with i5 650:

 

I am definitely lagging behind everyone because I have got one of the oldest processors out there an old E8400 but it still goes along well for what it does , hopefully I will get my way and get a Devils Canyon processor I am hoping to get the 8 core model not the Quad core...depends on my budget restraints...I hate those but I have to live with them...depends if I get a job or not....

 

Just tested my laptop too, an Intel i5-3317U, which is "1.8" GHz.

However, i had CPU-Z open while doing the benchmark, and it was actually running at 2.4GHz, out of a possible maximum 2.6GHz turbo boost.

I suggest anyone who hasnt overclocked, have CPU-Z open to verify their clocks, as its probably more than their Base clock but less than maximum Turbo clocks. This will help improve the accuracy of the results.



I was actually surprised how well my incredibly slow laptop performed, so i booted up the game for the first time, all graphics on lowest at 720p, plays excellent!

 

And depending on exact model 1 to 3 more pipeline stages